Re: [PATCH v2] ocfs2: Let ocfs2_setattr use new truncate sequence.
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Thu Jun 10 2010 - 00:43:09 EST
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:53:06AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> Let ocfs2 use the new truncate sequence. The changes include:
> 1. Remove the extra check for inode_newsize_ok since Christoph
> has moved it into inode_change_ok. So we will check it at the
> beginning of ocfs2_setattr.
So this deals with our questions regarding check of i_size outside
the inode cluster lock? (see fsdevel discussion)
> 2. Use truncate_setsize directly since we don't implement our
> own ->truncate and what we need is "update i_size and
> truncate_pagecache" which truncate_setsize now does.
> 3. For direct write, ocfs2 actually don't allow write to pass
> i_size(see ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write), so we don't have
> a chance to increase i_size. So remove the bogus check.
>
> Cc: Joel Becker <joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 34 +++++-----------------------------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> index 1fb0985..764fffb 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -983,10 +983,6 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
> }
>
> if (size_change && attr->ia_size != i_size_read(inode)) {
> - status = inode_newsize_ok(inode, attr->ia_size);
> - if (status)
> - goto bail_unlock;
> -
> if (i_size_read(inode) > attr->ia_size) {
While you're here, you should be able to use inode->i_size if you're
under i_mutex, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/