Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf: Provide a proper stop action for softwareevents
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jun 10 2010 - 12:38:59 EST
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 18:29 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Imagine you have several software and hardware events running on the
> same cpu. Each time you reset this period for a software event, you do
> a hw_pmu_disable() / hw_pmu_enable(), which writes/read the hardware
> register for each hardware events, amongst other wasteful things.
hw_perf_disable/enable() are on their way out. They should be replaced
with a struct pmu callback. We must remove all these weak functions if
we want to support multiple pmus.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/