Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/9] PM / Hibernate: swap, switch to hibernate_io_handle

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

(Sorry Jiri - unintentionally originally replied only to you).

On 02/06/10 18:52, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I addressed the comments I got on the previous RFC. I left the handles
> in place, the functions in hibernate_io_ops now works on them. Further
> I got rid of the memory barriers and minimized global variables as much
> as possible. Comments welcome.

I would like to hear the arguments for using these handles. I understand 
there may have been some previous discussion, but am unable to find it.

It seems far more sensible to me to not pass around a handle that 
virtually nothing actually uses, and instead store and utilise the state 
in the place where it is actually useful. If we had more than one struct 
hibernate_io_handle in use at a time, I could understand going this way. 
As it stands, however...

Regards,

Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/