Re: [PATCHv5 09/16] btrfs: remove junk sb_mark_dirty call

[Artem Bityutskiy]

Chris,

could you please ack or nack this patch?

On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 17:50 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> BTRFS does not define '->write_super()' method, so it should not
> mark its superblock as dirty. This looks like some left-over.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c |    1 -
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index caa4ed9..1419d90 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -2938,7 +2938,6 @@ int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  	dir->i_mtime = dir->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
>  	ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, dir);
>  	BUG_ON(ret);
> -	sb_mark_dirty(dir->i_sb);
>  
>  	btrfs_free_path(path);
>  	return 0;

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/