RE: [PATCH 02/18] DMAENGINE: ste_dma40: only write phy channelconfig first time
From: Linus WALLEIJ
Date: Mon Jun 14 2010 - 12:39:43 EST
Thanks Dan,
Is it OK that we send a new version of the entire patch set trying
to address all comments? (Then hopefully you can merge forward
through the set until there is some further issue.)
On 06/12/2010 12:23 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> We only need to write the configuration to a physical channel if it
>> is free, else it is already written.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Aaberg <jonas.aberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c index
>> 4618d6c..1cd1ff7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
>> @@ -1211,9 +1211,9 @@ out:
>> }
>>
>> static int d40_config_chan(struct d40_chan *d40c,
>> - struct stedma40_chan_cfg *info)
>> + struct stedma40_chan_cfg *info,
>> + bool is_free_phy)
>> {
>> -
>> /* Fill in basic CFG register values */
>> d40_phy_cfg(&d40c->dma_cfg, &d40c->src_def_cfg,
>> &d40c->dst_def_cfg, d40c->log_num !=
>> D40_PHY_CHAN); @@ -1230,8 +1230,14 @@ static int d40_config_chan(struct d40_chan *d40c,
>> d40c->dma_cfg.dst_dev_type * 32 + 16;
>> }
>>
>> - /* Write channel configuration to the DMA */
>> - return d40_config_write(d40c);
>> + /*
>> + * Only write channel configuration to the DMA if the physical
>> + * resource is free. In case of multiple logical channels
>> + * on the same physical resource, only the first write is necessary.
>> + */
>> + if (is_free_phy)
>> + return d40_config_write(d40c);
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int d40_config_memcpy(struct d40_chan *d40c) @@ -1691,7
>> +1697,7 @@ static int d40_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>> unsigned long flags;
>> struct d40_chan *d40c =
>> container_of(chan, struct d40_chan, chan);
>> -
>> + bool is_free_phy;
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&d40c->lock, flags);
>>
>> d40c->completed = chan->cookie = 1; @@ -1705,6 +1711,7 @@
>> static int d40_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>> if (err)
>> goto err_alloc;
>> }
>> + is_free_phy = (d40c->phy_chan == NULL);
>>
>
> It seems like d40_config_chan() just wants to be open coded in
> d40_alloc_chan_resources(). It does not have its own local variables,
> and the only thing that returns an error is d40_config_write().
True. There are a few more such smaller functions that shall be removed.
I will do the clean up in a second version of this patch set, ok?
>
> While trying to figure out why this flag was needed I happened to
> notice a gratuitous use of gotos in d40_allocate_channel(). Can we
> make this function easier to read by just returning -EINVAL directly
> when those tests fail?
We'll try to see if I can make this function easier to read with less gotos.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/