Re: [PATCH 00/13] jump label v9

[David Miller]

From: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:28:11 -0400

> For example, the reason I have it in the code is b/c x86 determines
> the best no-op at run-time. Are other architectures going to have to
> require this kind of functionality. Or like sparc, are we going to
> be able to generally hard-code the nops on non-x86 at compile-time?

I think most architectures will use a constant nop sequence, in fact
x86 is the only one I can think of that needs variable nop sequences.

Why not abstract this behind some asm/jump_label.h macro just like
everything else?  "jump_label_text_poke_early()" or similar.
On sparc64 I would define this to:

#include <asm/system.h>

static inline void jump_label_text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
{
	u32 new_insn = *(u32 *)opcode;
	u32 *insn_p = (u32 *) addr;

	*insn_p = new_insn;
	flushi(insn_p);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/