Re: futex: race in lock and unlock&exit for robust futex with PI?

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Jun 28 2010 - 12:46:35 EST

Next message: Pekka Enberg: "Re: [S+Q 01/16] [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Bugfix for semop() not reporting successful operation"
Previous message: Maxime Bizon: "[PATCH] fs: make sure do_change_type() gets a valid type."
In reply to: Michal Hocko: "Re: futex: race in lock and unlock&exit for robust futex with PI?"
Next in thread: Michal Hocko: "Re: futex: race in lock and unlock&exit for robust futex with PI?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 18:39 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:

> [I am sorry for bombarding you with emails]

You can lessen the burden on all of us by trimming your emails more
aggressively. Your last one has 4 dead tails in it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pekka Enberg: "Re: [S+Q 01/16] [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Bugfix for semop() not reporting successful operation"
Previous message: Maxime Bizon: "[PATCH] fs: make sure do_change_type() gets a valid type."
In reply to: Michal Hocko: "Re: futex: race in lock and unlock&exit for robust futex with PI?"
Next in thread: Michal Hocko: "Re: futex: race in lock and unlock&exit for robust futex with PI?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]