Re: [patch] btrfs: make code reachable in btrfs_insert_some_items()

From: Miao Xie
Date: Mon Jun 28 2010 - 20:56:13 EST


Hi,

on 2010-6-28 19:17, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The break was in front of the "nr = i" assignment so that was never hit.

This bug has been fixed a month ago, and the patch has been merged into the
btrfs-unstable tree.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=127434036913484&w=2

Thanks
Miao
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index 0d1d966..ceb8ad2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -3453,8 +3453,8 @@ int btrfs_insert_some_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> if (total_size + data_size[i] + sizeof(struct btrfs_item) >
> BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(root)) {
> - break;
> nr = i;
> + break;
> }
> total_data += data_size[i];
> total_size += data_size[i] + sizeof(struct btrfs_item);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/