Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Revert "writeback: limitwrite_cache_pages integrity scanning to current EOF"

[Joel Becker]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:20:33PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I dunno. Filesystem corruption makes me nervous. So I'm certainly
> totally willing to do the revert if that makes ocfs2 work again. Even
> if "work again" happens to be partly by mistake, and for some reason
> that isn't obvious.

	Filesystem corruption makes me more than nervous.  I'm quite
devastated by this.

> Your call, I guess.  If any ocfs2 fix looks scary, and you'd prefer to
> have an -rc4 (in a few days - not today) with just the revert, I'm ok
> with that. Even if it's only a "at least no worse than 2.6.34"
> situation rather than a real fix.

	I've checked both before this patch and with the patch reverted.
We corrupt in both cases.  The problem is our assumption about zeroing
past i_size.  The revert will fix our BUG_ON, but not the corruption.
	Mark and I have ideas on how to fix the actual bug, but they
will take some time and especially testing.  We also have some
shorter-term ideas on how to paper over the issue.  We have to have to
have this fixed by .35.
	If -rc4 isn't coming for a couple of days, can we hold off on
the decision until we get a chance to think about a paper-over solution
for it?  Then we can avoid the revert.

Joel

-- 

You can use a screwdriver to screw in screws or to clean your ears,
however, the latter needs real skill, determination and a lack of fear
of injuring yourself.  It is much the same with JavaScript.
	- Chris Heilmann

Joel Becker
Consulting Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/