Re: [patch 51/52] fs: per-zone dentry and inode LRU

[Dave Chinner]

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:03:03PM +1000, npiggin@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Per-zone LRUs and shrinkers for dentry and inode caches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>

This destroys any notion we have of global LRU-ness of inode and
dentry caches, doesn't it? Can you outline in more detail what sort
of reclaim pattern this results in. e.g. is a workload running on
a single node now effectively limited to a dentry/icache size within
the local node because of local node slab allocation and per-zone
reclaim?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/