Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] perf pmu interface -v2
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jul 01 2010 - 10:36:28 EST
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 16:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Not exactly sure how I could have messed up the ARM architecture code to
> make this happen though... will have a peek.
I did find a bug in there, not sure it could have been responsible for
this but who knows...
Pushed out a new git tree with the below delta folded in.
---
Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -221,27 +221,6 @@ again:
}
static void
-armpmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
-{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
- struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
- int idx = hwc->idx;
-
- WARN_ON(idx < 0);
-
- clear_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask);
- armpmu->disable(hwc, idx);
-
- barrier();
-
- armpmu_event_update(event, hwc, idx);
- cpuc->events[idx] = NULL;
- clear_bit(idx, cpuc->used_mask);
-
- perf_event_update_userpage(event);
-}
-
-static void
armpmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
@@ -267,6 +246,8 @@ armpmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, in
*/
if (!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)) {
armpmu->disable(hwc, hwc->idx);
+ barrier(); /* why? */
+ armpmu_event_update(event, hwc, hwc->idx);
hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED | PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
}
}
@@ -289,7 +270,7 @@ armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, i
hwc->state = 0;
/*
* Set the period again. Some counters can't be stopped, so when we
- * were throttled we simply disabled the IRQ source and the counter
+ * were stopped we simply disabled the IRQ source and the counter
* may have been left counting. If we don't do this step then we may
* get an interrupt too soon or *way* too late if the overflow has
* happened since disabling.
@@ -298,6 +279,23 @@ armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, i
armpmu->enable(hwc, hwc->idx);
}
+static void
+armpmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
+{
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+ struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ int idx = hwc->idx;
+
+ WARN_ON(idx < 0);
+
+ clear_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask);
+ armpmu_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
+ cpuc->events[idx] = NULL;
+ clear_bit(idx, cpuc->used_mask);
+
+ perf_event_update_userpage(event);
+}
+
static int
armpmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
@@ -1075,7 +1073,7 @@ armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num,
continue;
if (perf_event_overflow(event, 0, &data, regs))
- armpmu_stop(event, 0);
+ armpmu->disable(hwc, idx);
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/