[patch 139/164] KVM: SVM: Dont use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map

[Greg KH]

2.6.33-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>

Use of kmap_atomic disables preemption but if we run in
shadow-shadow mode the vmrun emulation executes kvm_set_cr3
which might sleep or fault. So use kmap instead for
nested_svm_map.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

(cherry picked from commit 7597f129d8b6799da7a264e6d6f7401668d3a36d)
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1398,7 +1398,7 @@ static inline int nested_svm_intr(struct
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 gpa, enum km_type idx)
+static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 gpa, struct page **_page)
 {
 	struct page *page;
 
@@ -1406,7 +1406,9 @@ static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_
 	if (is_error_page(page))
 		goto error;
 
-	return kmap_atomic(page, idx);
+	*_page = page;
+
+	return kmap(page);
 
 error:
 	kvm_release_page_clean(page);
@@ -1415,16 +1417,9 @@ error:
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
+static void nested_svm_unmap(struct page *page)
 {
-	struct page *page;
-
-	if (!addr)
-		return;
-
-	page = kmap_atomic_to_page(addr);
-
-	kunmap_atomic(addr, idx);
+	kunmap(page);
 	kvm_release_page_dirty(page);
 }
 
@@ -1432,6 +1427,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(
 {
 	u32 param = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 & 1;
 	u32 msr = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
+	struct page *page;
 	bool ret = false;
 	u32 t0, t1;
 	u8 *msrpm;
@@ -1439,7 +1435,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(
 	if (!(svm->nested.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_MSR_PROT)))
 		return false;
 
-	msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+	msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, &page);
 
 	if (!msrpm)
 		goto out;
@@ -1467,7 +1463,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(
 	ret = msrpm[t1] & ((1 << param) << t0);
 
 out:
-	nested_svm_unmap(msrpm, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1590,6 +1586,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu
 	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
 	struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
 	struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
+	struct page *page;
 
 	trace_kvm_nested_vmexit_inject(vmcb->control.exit_code,
 				       vmcb->control.exit_info_1,
@@ -1597,7 +1594,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu
 				       vmcb->control.exit_int_info,
 				       vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err);
 
-	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, &page);
 	if (!nested_vmcb)
 		return 1;
 
@@ -1687,7 +1684,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu
 	/* Exit nested SVM mode */
 	svm->nested.vmcb = 0;
 
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	kvm_mmu_reset_context(&svm->vcpu);
 	kvm_mmu_load(&svm->vcpu);
@@ -1698,9 +1695,10 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu
 static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
 	u32 *nested_msrpm;
+	struct page *page;
 	int i;
 
-	nested_msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+	nested_msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, &page);
 	if (!nested_msrpm)
 		return false;
 
@@ -1709,7 +1707,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struc
 
 	svm->vmcb->control.msrpm_base_pa = __pa(svm->nested.msrpm);
 
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -1719,8 +1717,9 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu
 	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
 	struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
 	struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
+	struct page *page;
 
-	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, &page);
 	if (!nested_vmcb)
 		return false;
 
@@ -1832,7 +1831,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nested_vmcb->control.event_inj;
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err = nested_vmcb->control.event_inj_err;
 
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	enable_gif(svm);
 
@@ -1858,6 +1857,7 @@ static void nested_svm_vmloadsave(struct
 static int vmload_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
 	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
+	struct page *page;
 
 	if (nested_svm_check_permissions(svm))
 		return 1;
@@ -1865,12 +1865,12 @@ static int vmload_interception(struct vc
 	svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
 	skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
 
-	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, &page);
 	if (!nested_vmcb)
 		return 1;
 
 	nested_svm_vmloadsave(nested_vmcb, svm->vmcb);
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -1878,6 +1878,7 @@ static int vmload_interception(struct vc
 static int vmsave_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
 	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
+	struct page *page;
 
 	if (nested_svm_check_permissions(svm))
 		return 1;
@@ -1885,12 +1886,12 @@ static int vmsave_interception(struct vc
 	svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
 	skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
 
-	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, &page);
 	if (!nested_vmcb)
 		return 1;
 
 	nested_svm_vmloadsave(svm->vmcb, nested_vmcb);
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	return 1;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/