Re: [PATCH] Fixed division by zero bug in kernel/padata.c

[Herbert Xu]

On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:35:32PM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote:
>
> > Both cases should be handled in the same way. So we could just
> > stop the instance if the cpumasks do not intersect, and enable
> > it as soon as they do intersect again. The padata instance would
> > refuse to do anything as long as the cpumasks do not intersect,
> > but it is still in a consistent state. Let me add the infrastructure
> > to handle this, then you can use it with your patches.
> 
> Ok, get it.

So I should wait for another patch, right?

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/