Re: [PATCH -V14 0/11] Generic name to handle and open by handlesyscalls

From: Dave Chinner
Date: Tue Jul 06 2010 - 19:24:02 EST


On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:39:56PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:10:02 -0400, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:45:45AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> > > One use case i had was that if the userspace file server can directly
> > > work with the returned file system UUID,
> >
> > I agree that the uuid should be split out from the rest of the
> > filehandle, but ...
> >
> > > the it can build the file
> > > handle for client in a single call.
> >
> > ... I don't understand why both need to come in the same system call.
> > Is it purely an efficiency question? If so, why do you expect this to
> > be significant?
>
> Since we know that system wide file handle should include a file system
> identifier and a file identifier my plan was to retrieve both in the
> same syscall.
>
>
> >
> > (I would have thought that the system call overhead is so small, and so
> > many calls will already be required to perform the typical rpc, that
> > this would be insignificant.)
> >
> > A filesystem uuid seems like a generally useful thing (maybe more so
> > than a filehandle), so it'd seem worth figuring out how to export that
> > separately.
> >
>
> I can add a new syscall that returns
>
> struct fs_uuid {
> u8 fs_uuid[16];
> };
>
> long sys_get_fs_uuid(int dfd, char *name, struct fs_uuid *fsid, int flag);

libblkid already provides the UUID to userspace applications, doesn't it?

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/