Re: [PATCH] Rearrange i_flags to be consistent with FS_IOC_GETFLAGS

[Dave Chinner]

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:45:25AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I'd prefer generic flags are not dependent on fixed values from a
> > specific filesystem several layers down the storage stack.
> 
> They're not so dependent.

History says otherwise. :)

> They're based on the FS_IOC_[GS]ETFLAGS ioctl which
> even XFS translates its flags for.

Sure, because the ioctl flags values are derived
from the ext2 on-disk format flags and hence don't match anything
XFS related at all.

> These ioctl flags must now remain
> invariant.  Whilst they might have originated as Ext2/3/4 flags, they're now
> independent of that.

Yes, the ioctl flags must remain invariant. OTOH, the generic inode
flags (S_*) have no such invariant requirement and have a history of
frequent change. IMO, that means some flags should not be tied to
the value of a specific subsystem just so a subsystem specific
optimisation can be made. It just seems like a dangerous layering
violation to be making...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/