Re: [PATCH] time/fs - file's time race with vgettimeofday
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Wed Jul 07 2010 - 13:11:22 EST
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 04:11:40PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:03 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This issue was described in the BZ 244697
> > >
> > > Time goes backward - gettimeofday() vs. rename()
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244697
> > >
> > >
> > > It's not just issue of the creat but few others like rename.
> > >
> > >
> > > The following patch will prevent the race by adding the
> > > CURRENT_TIME_SEC_REAL macro, which will return seconds from
> > > the getnstimeofday call, ensuring it's computed on current tick.
> > > It fixes the 'creat' case for ext4.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how much trouble is having this race unfixed compared
> > > to the performance impact the fix might have. Maybe there're
> > > better ways to fix this.
> >
> > I do worry that your patch will have too much of a performance hit. I
> > think the right fix would be in vtime().
> >
> > Test patch to follow shortly.
>
> So the following (untested) patch _should_ resolve this in mainline on
> x86. Please let me know if it works for you.
>
> However, for older kernels, this patch won't be sufficient, as it
> depends on update_vsyscall getting the time at the last tick in its
> wall_time, and kernels that don't have the logarithmic accumulation code
> & remove xtime_cache patches can't be fixed so easily.
>
> Once we get this upstream, let me know if you have any questions about
> how to backport this to older kernels.
>
> thanks
> -john
>
>
>
> [PATCH] x86: Fix vtime/file timestamp inconsistencies
>
> Due to vtime calling vgettimeofday(), its possible that an application
> could call time();create("stuff",O_RDRW); only to see the file's
> creation timestamp to be before the value returned by time.
>
> The proper fix is to make vtime use the same time value as
> current_kernel_time() (which is exported via update_vsyscall) instead of
> vgettime().
>
>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
> index 1c0c6ab..ce9a4fa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
> @@ -169,13 +169,18 @@ int __vsyscall(0) vgettimeofday(struct timeval * tv, struct timezone * tz)
> * unlikely */
> time_t __vsyscall(1) vtime(time_t *t)
> {
> - struct timeval tv;
> + unsigned seq;
> time_t result;
> if (unlikely(!__vsyscall_gtod_data.sysctl_enabled))
> return time_syscall(t);
>
> - vgettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> - result = tv.tv_sec;
> + do {
> + seq = read_seqbegin(&__vsyscall_gtod_data.lock);
> +
> + result = vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_time_sec;
> +
> + } while (read_seqretry(&__vsyscall_gtod_data.lock, seq));
> +
> if (t)
> *t = result;
> return result;
>
>
I think there's a typo in using "vsyscall_gtod_data" inside
the vtime call it should be "__vsyscall_gtod_data" intead.
attaching changed patch
wbr,
jirka
---
[PATCH] x86: Fix vtime/file timestamp inconsistencies
Due to vtime calling vgettimeofday(), its possible that an application
could call time();create("stuff",O_RDRW); only to see the file's
creation timestamp to be before the value returned by time.
The proper fix is to make vtime use the same time value as
current_kernel_time() (which is exported via update_vsyscall) instead of
vgettime().
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
index 1c0c6ab..dce0c3c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -169,13 +169,18 @@ int __vsyscall(0) vgettimeofday(struct timeval * tv, struct timezone * tz)
* unlikely */
time_t __vsyscall(1) vtime(time_t *t)
{
- struct timeval tv;
+ unsigned seq;
time_t result;
if (unlikely(!__vsyscall_gtod_data.sysctl_enabled))
return time_syscall(t);
- vgettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
- result = tv.tv_sec;
+ do {
+ seq = read_seqbegin(&__vsyscall_gtod_data.lock);
+
+ result = __vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_time_sec;
+
+ } while (read_seqretry(&__vsyscall_gtod_data.lock, seq));
+
if (t)
*t = result;
return result;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/