Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.

[Justin P. Mattock]

On 08/09/2010 03:12 PM, Valeo de Vries wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 22:56, Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > On 08/09/2010 02:28 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:15 +0300, Mihai DonÈu wrote:
> > > > Wait. I don't think we're on the same page here. I'm talking about
> > > > message
> > > > signing (which does not require the receiving end to have any key - it's
> > > > the
> > > > same plain text e-mail with a blob after it) while you refer to actually
> > > > encrypting the message. Mm? Or am I being extremely slow today? :-)
> > >
> > > Only when you assume that Exchange would pass signed messages without
> > > corrupting them. It really is that broken.
> >
> > figured the encryption would be kind of a last resort situation..but if it's
> > that broken to where it wont pass it along without corrupting, then the best
> > solution is to figure out what Microsoft needs in terms of encoding, i.e. is
> > there a way to have the scanner scan but not throw everything around after
> > it scans.(if this is what it's doing)
>
> The link I posted earlier seems to give the impression that
> quoted-printable might do that. I may have misread that, though...
>
> Valeo


make sense.. Im wondering if it's a simple tell microsoft to scan the 
original email, take the garbled copied email and send out the original 
email rather than updating exchange etc...

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/