Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with runningperfctrs

From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Tue Aug 10 2010 - 15:24:36 EST


On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 10.08.10 13:24:51, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > It gets masked on NMI arrival, at least for some models (Core Duo, P4,
> > P6 M and I suspect more theh that, that was the reason oprofile has
> > it, also there is a note in SDM V3a page 643).
>
> Yes, that's right, I never noticed that. Maybe it is better to
> implement the apic write it in model specific code then.
>

Perhaps we can make it simplier I think, ie like it was before -- we just
move it under your new DIE_NMIUNKNOWN, in separate patch of course. Though
I'm fine with either way.

(actually it's interesting to know wouldn't we leave lvt masked when
we hit 'second delayed nmi has arrived' situation, I guess we didn't
hit it before in real yet :-)

> -Robert
>
> --
> Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> Operating System Research Center
>
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/