[13/54] splice: fix misuse of SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK

[Greg KH]

2.6.34-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 6965031d331a642e31278fa1b5bd47f372ffdd5d upstream.

SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK is clearly documented to only affect blocking on the
pipe.  In __generic_file_splice_read(), however, it causes an EAGAIN
if the page is currently being read.

This makes it impossible to write an application that only wants
failure if the pipe is full.  For example if the same process is
handling both ends of a pipe and isn't otherwise able to determine
whether a splice to the pipe will fill it or not.

We could make the read non-blocking on O_NONBLOCK or some other splice
flag, but for now this is the simplest fix.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 fs/splice.c |   12 +-----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/splice.c
+++ b/fs/splice.c
@@ -366,17 +366,7 @@ __generic_file_splice_read(struct file *
 		 * If the page isn't uptodate, we may need to start io on it
 		 */
 		if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
-			/*
-			 * If in nonblock mode then dont block on waiting
-			 * for an in-flight io page
-			 */
-			if (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK) {
-				if (!trylock_page(page)) {
-					error = -EAGAIN;
-					break;
-				}
-			} else
-				lock_page(page);
+			lock_page(page);
 
 			/*
 			 * Page was truncated, or invalidated by the


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/