[PATCH 2/3] cgroup_freezer: Fix can_attach to prohibit moving from/to freezing/frozen cgroups
From: Tomasz Buchert
Date: Thu Aug 12 2010 - 05:45:46 EST
It is possible to move a task from its cgroup
even if this group is 'FREEZING'. This results in
a nasty bug - the moved task will become frozen OUTSIDE
its original cgroup and will remain in a permanent 'D' state.
This patch allows to migrate the task only between THAWED cgroups.
This behavior was observed and easily reproduced on
a single core laptop. Notice that reproducibility depends
highly on the machine used. Program and instructions how
to reproduce the bug can be fetched from:
http://pentium.hopto.org/~thinred/repos/linux-misc/freezer_bug.c
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Buchert <tomasz.buchert@xxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/cgroup_freezer.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
index 321e2a0..c287627 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
@@ -173,24 +173,25 @@ static int freezer_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
/*
* Anything frozen can't move or be moved to/from.
- *
- * Since orig_freezer->state == FROZEN means that @task has been
- * frozen, so it's sufficient to check the latter condition.
*/
- if (is_task_frozen_enough(task))
+ freezer = cgroup_freezer(new_cgroup);
+ if (freezer->state != CGROUP_THAWED)
return -EBUSY;
- freezer = cgroup_freezer(new_cgroup);
- if (freezer->state == CGROUP_FROZEN)
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (__cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(task)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (threadgroup) {
struct task_struct *c;
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(c, &task->thread_group, thread_group) {
- if (is_task_frozen_enough(c)) {
+ if (__cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(c)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return -EBUSY;
}
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/