Re: [PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG

From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Date: Fri Aug 13 2010 - 09:02:38 EST

Next message: Bill Pemberton: "Re: [patch] usb/serial/ssu100: uninitialized variable"
Previous message: Uros Bizjak: "[PATCH] scsi: IPS, IBMMCA: Use hex_asc_hi and hex_asc_lo"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello Tejun,

Tejun Heo, on 08/12/2010 04:41 PM wrote:

Nobody is making meaningful use of ORDERED_BY_TAG now and queue
draining for barrier requests will be removed soon which will render
the advantage of tag ordering moot.

Have you seen Hannes Reinecke's and my measurements in http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128110662528485&w=2 and http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128111995217405&w=2 correspondingly?

If yes, what else evidences do you need to see that the tag ordering is a big performance win?

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Pemberton: "Re: [patch] usb/serial/ssu100: uninitialized variable"
Previous message: Uros Bizjak: "[PATCH] scsi: IPS, IBMMCA: Use hex_asc_hi and hex_asc_lo"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]