Re: [0/3] 2.6.27.52 stable review

From: Grant Coady
Date: Fri Aug 13 2010 - 18:36:55 EST


On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:47:04 -0700, you wrote:

>NOTE!
>
>If I could get some people to please test this -rc release? It contains
>a few core changes that I couldn't validate myself as I don't seem to
>have a machine that will even boot the .27 kernel anymore after my move.

I surely will, just as soon as the thing appears ;) Ftp and http
return nothing just now.

Grant.
>
>I didn't want to include them in the last .27-stable release because of
>this, so any testing is much appreciated. Especially if you happen to
>run across any signal and/or stack issues that might be floating around
>in the ether...
>
>----
>
>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.27.52 release.
>There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
>this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
>us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
>to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
>
>Responses should be made by Monday, August 16, 2010, 20:00:00 UTC.
>Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
>The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.27.52-rc1.gz
>and the diffstat can be found below.
>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h
>
> Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 9 ++++++++-
> mm/memory.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/