Re: [0/3] 2.6.27.52 stable review

[Grant Coady]

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:47:29 -0700, you wrote:

>On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:12:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Machine is running, but there's a lot of these in the dmesg:
>> >
>> > WARNING: at include/linux/security.h:1826 acct_stack_growth+0xe7/0xf0()
>> 
>> That would seem to be because of the lack of commit 05fa199d45c in
>> 2.6.27. It got marked for stable, but probably never went so far back
>> as 2.6.27.
>
>Yup, I didn't include it there.  Grant, if you add that, does the
>warning go away?

I'm sorry, no idea at all how to cherry pick that, I don't know git :( 

Google brings up this thread but not that commit, point me at it and 
I'll try it.  

Grant.

>
>> That said, I do wonder if it is worth it maintaining a 2.6.27 that the
>> maintainer can't even boot on his machines any more.
>
>Yeah, I'm beginning to wonder about it as well.  I think it's expected
>lifespan is very near to the end.
>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/