On 08/16/2010 09:39 AM, Tao Ma wrote:Do you have the link for this or it will show up in the mail list soon?Now in CMWQ, workqueue threads are named as 'kworker/*'. So it is
a little boring to see in the 'top'(below) and actually it isn't
meaningful for the users.
12606 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 2 0.0 0:03.22 kworker/u:0
12607 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 1 0.0 0:03.69 kworker/u:4
So this patch just try to set the proper workqueue name if it does
exist. Yes, workqueue now is a thread pool and the data may be not
accurate but I think it is better(below) than the 'kworker*' stuff.
And if there is something block the workqueue, we can find the caller
easily.
12606 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 2 0.0 0:02.90 dlm_wq
12607 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 0 0.0 0:03.21 ocfs2_wq
What's more, in ocfs2, we sometimes want to print some debug info in
the system log and we use 'current->comm' to print the thread and this
change also does help.
The only thing I am not clear is that do we need [gs]et_task_comm?
I guess not and this patch just try to use strlcpy without task_lock.
Cc: Tejun Heo<tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma<tao.ma@xxxxxxxxxx>
I thought about the same thing but this doesn't provide any more
information than stack traces for debugging and for run time tracking
implementing tracing API (scheduled to be added in this devel cycle)
is the right approach.
change program name. It will confuse more than help. So, unlessOK, let me find other ways ocfs2 can use to trace the real callers of some functions in runtime.
there are other reasons for doing this, I don't think I'm gonna take
this one.