[4/6] mm: pass correct mm when growing stack

[Greg KH]

2.6.27-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 05fa199d45c54a9bda7aa3ae6537253d6f097aa9 upstream.

Tetsuo Handa reports seeing the WARN_ON(current->mm == NULL) in
security_vm_enough_memory(), when do_execve() is touching the
target mm's stack, to set up its args and environment.

Yes, a UMH_NO_WAIT or UMH_WAIT_PROC call_usermodehelper() spawns
an mm-less kernel thread to do the exec.  And in any case, that
vm_enough_memory check when growing stack ought to be done on the
target mm, not on the execer's mm (though apart from the warning,
it only makes a slight tweak to OVERCOMMIT_NEVER behaviour).

Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 mm/mmap.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -1573,7 +1573,7 @@ static int acct_stack_growth(struct vm_a
 	 * Overcommit..  This must be the final test, as it will
 	 * update security statistics.
 	 */
-	if (security_vm_enough_memory(grow))
+	if (security_vm_enough_memory_mm(mm, grow))
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	/* Ok, everything looks good - let it rip */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/