Re: [PATCH] Ramoops: use the platform data structure instead ofmodule params

[Kyungmin Park]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Marco Stornelli
<marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2010/8/18 Kyungmin Park <kmpark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> As each board and system has different memory for ramoops. It's better to define the platform data instead of module params.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> It seems good. Currently there isn't any code that register a ramoops
> device, isn't it?

At this time

I wrote it below

static struct ramoops_platform_data goni_ramoops_data = {
        .mem_size               = SZ_16K,
        .mem_address            = 0xED000000,   /* MODEM SRAM */
};

static struct platform_device goni_ramoops = {
        .name = "ramoops",
        .dev = {
                .platform_data = &goni_ramoops_data,
        },
};

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/