Re: [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

 On 08/23/2010 10:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Are you allowed to mlock a stack page which has not yet been faulted
> in ?  What effect does it have ?  I wasn't able to find a convincing
> de jure answer to this question.
>
> But you seem, like me, to be disagreeing with Linus's assertion that
> calling mlock() on the stack is something no sane programs does ?

Doing hypercalls from userspace is a silly hack to avoid putting dom0
hypercall knowledge into the kernel.  mlock in that area has always been
problematic (initially on Solaris, and increasingly on Linux) and we're
going to have to fix it at some point.  I wouldn't spend a lot of time
defending it.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/