On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:48:29 +0100
Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 06:37:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:Hi,It's possible Andrew has a reason that hasn't been picked up yet.
> Hm is there some problem with this patch or has the processing of
> it simply stalled? When I read the thread I cannot see Hanumaths
> answers on the list but it looks mainly like the patch is OK and
> there is some chit-chat.
> > Can it be picked up? Everyone is going to need DDR MMC for their
> eMMCs soon-ish.
I'd like to dedicate more time to mmc/. Do you think it'd be useful
for me to catch all the patches sent to linux-mmc@ into a public Git
tree, and periodically report on what went upstream via akpm and
what's still waiting?
Kyungmin Park's questions didn't seem adequately answered and the
discussion kind of died.
I updated the patch and merged it, but I'd like the outstanding
question(s) resolved. ie: why do we add MMC_DDR_MODE, set it in
brq.data.flags and then never use it?