Re: [patch 1/5] mm: add nofail variants of kmalloc kcalloc andkzalloc

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 23:24 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> That is, the guarantee that we will always make progress simply does
> not exist in filesystems, so a mempool-like concept seems to me to
> be doomed from the start.... 

While I appreciate that it might be somewhat (a lot) harder for a
filesystem to provide that guarantee, I'd be deeply worried about your
claim that its impossible.

It would render a system without swap very prone to deadlocks. Even with
the very tight dirty page accounting we currently have you can fill all
your memory with anonymous pages, at which point there's nothing free
and you require writeout of dirty pages to succeed.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/