Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with runningperfctrs

[Don Zickus]

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:34:04PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > I'll keep looking for the race condition to better fix it.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Don
> > 
> 
> Sounds promising, mind to post new inter-diff? Ie what you have
> changed from Robert's patch.

It was really in Peter's patch, just a stupid hack for now.

Cheers,
Don


diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 4539b4b..9e65a7b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -777,7 +777,9 @@ again:
 
 done:
 	intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
-	return handled;
+	if (!handled)
+		return handled;
+	return ++handled;
 }
 
 static struct event_constraint *
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/