Re: [PATCH] SATA / AHCI: Do not play with the link PM during suspend to RAM
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu Aug 26 2010 - 19:11:52 EST
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On 08/23/2010 08:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 23, 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >> Hello, sorry about the delay.
> > >>
> > >> On 08/19/2010 06:23 PM, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
> > >>> It says "max_performance", I have not touched anyhting. So it has been
> > >>> like that all the time. Would this explain why your patch did not show
> > >>> the debug printout?
> > >>
> > >> Hmm... okay. Yeah, if you haven't been using IPM at all, there won't
> > >> be any debug messages but at the same time the posted patch should
> > >> have had the same effect as Rafael's patch as IPM path isn't traveled
> > >> at all. Can you please check the followings?
> > >>
> > >> * You're actually running the correct patched kernel and modules. It
> > >> probably is a good idea to add a printk message. ie. Apply the
> > >> patch and add a printk() in ata_host_request_pm() in libata-core.c
> > >> and make sure the debug messages appears.
> > >>
> > >> * Rafael's patch actually fixes the problem. If you haven't been
> > >> using IPM at all, Rafael's patch and mine should behave exactly the
> > >> same (ie. no IPM operation at all during suspend/resume). It could
> > >> be that you're seeing a different issue.
> > >>
> > >> Rafael, can you please test my patch and see how your case behaves?
> > >
> > > This one: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/5/328 ?
> >
> > Yeap, that one. I can prep a test git branch if necessary.
>
> No need to, but it's going to take a few days to verify on my box.
Well, no luck. I was able to reproduce the issue on my box with this patch
applied on top of 2.6.32-rc2.
Which probably means that the link power management is not really involved
here and seems to turn up this statement:
rc = ata_host_request_pm(host, mesg, 0, ATA_EHI_QUIET, 1);
in ata_host_suspend() as the culprit.
Does it make sense?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/