Re: [PATCH -mm] uml: disable CONFIG_HAS_DMA

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:13:13 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 06:17:56PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > I think that it's better to detect DMA misuse at build time rather
> > than calling BUG_ON. Architectures that can't do DMA need to disable
> > CONFIG_HAS_DMA.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/um/Kconfig.um                |    3 +
> >  arch/um/defconfig                 |    1 -
> >  arch/um/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |  112 -------------------------------------
> >  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/um/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig.um b/arch/um/Kconfig.um
> > index ec2b8da..3de40b8 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/Kconfig.um
> > +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig.um
> > @@ -147,3 +147,6 @@ config KERNEL_STACK_ORDER
> >  	  This option determines the size of UML kernel stacks.  They will
> >  	  be 1 << order pages.  The default is OK unless you're running Valgrind
> >  	  on UML, in which case, set this to 3.
> > +
> > +config HAS_DMA
> > +       def_bool n
> 
> Other archs define NO_DMA to say they do not have DMA.
> We should do it the same way for um.

Defining NO_DMA affects any code? In other words, we can kill NO_DMA
definition?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/