Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim uselock_page() instead trylock_page()

[Minchan Kim]

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim
> pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of
> trylock_page() in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/