Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] posix clock tuning

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Richard Cochran wrote:

> Recently on the lkml, we discussed how to allow adjustment of posix
> clocks. I have tried to understand and implement the ideas expressed
> in the various threads.

Cc'ing the relevant maintainers to such discussions and patches might
be helpful. Seems I need to do some archive digging.

> If there is agreement on this approach, I will resubmit these two
> patches as part of a longer series, including support for a new kind
> of hardware clock, so you can see how it all fits together. But first,
> I would like to concentrate on the new syscall itself.
> 
> The patches are against a recent net-next tree. Please don't worry if
> the syscall tables are not quite up to date. I can fix that later.

How is this related to net-next ? 

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/