Re: disabling group leader perf_event

[Ingo Molnar]

* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun 2010-09-12 22:32:58, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Sun 2010-09-12 20:48:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > > > >  1- Most (least abstract) specific code: a block of bytecode in the form
> > > > > >     of a simplified, executable, kernel-checked x86 machine code block -
> > > > > >     this is also the fastest form. [yes, this is actually possible.]
> > > > > >Well... if we want to be a bit x86-entric.... can we just reuse ACPI
> > > > > >interpretter?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I hope this was a joke, ACPI won the academy awards for ugliness, 
> > > > > ..., bad specification, non-generality, and 
> > > 
> > > As did i386 instruction set :-).
> > 
> > Are you kidding? The i386 instruction set may be ugly, but it's 
> > implemented in hardware, which has obvious upsides.
> 
> I was partly joking. But you have to admit that i386 set is ugly and 
> badly specified.

Fortunately since i already said that it's ugly, in the sentence you 
quote above, i dont have to 'admit' it yet again, right? ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/