Re: [PATCH] spi_mpc8xxx: issue with using definition of pram inDevice Tree
From: Grant Likely
Date: Fri Sep 24 2010 - 03:10:16 EST
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:05:03AM +0200, christophe leroy wrote:
> This patch applies to 2.6.34.7 and 2.6.35.4
> It fixes an issue during the probe for CPM1 with definition of parameter ram from DTS
>
> Signed-off-by: christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
I'm sorry, I don't understand the fix from the given description.
What is the problem, and why is cpm_muram_alloc_fixed() the wrong
thing to call on CPM1? Does CPM2 still need it?
g.
>
> diff -urN b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c c/drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c
> --- b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c 2010-09-08 16:43:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ c/drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c 2010-09-08 16:44:03.000000000 +0200
> @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@
> if (!iprop || size != sizeof(*iprop) * 4)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - spi_base_ofs = cpm_muram_alloc_fixed(iprop[2], 2);
> + spi_base_ofs = iprop[2];
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(spi_base_ofs))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -844,7 +844,6 @@
> return spi_base_ofs;
> }
>
> - cpm_muram_free(spi_base_ofs);
> return pram_ofs;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/