Re: [PATCH] irqbalance, powerpc: add IRQs without settable SMPaffinity to banned list

[Neil Horman]

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 04:56:34PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> 
> > > >  			size_t size =3D 0;
> > > >  			FILE *file;
> > > >  			sprintf(buf, "/proc/irq/%i/smp_affinity", number);
> > > > -			file =3D fopen(buf, "r");
> > > > +			file =3D fopen(buf, "r+");
> > > >  			if (!file)
> > > >  				continue;
> > > >  			if (getline(&line, &size, file)=3D=3D0) {
> > > > @@ -89,7 +89,14 @@
> > > >  				continue;
> > > >  			}
> > > >  			cpumask_parse_user(line, strlen(line), irq->mask);
> > > > -			fclose(file);
> > > > +			/*
> > > > +			 * Check that we can write the affinity, if
> > > > +			 * not take it out of the list.
> > > > +			 */
> > > > +			if (fputs(line, file) =3D=3D EOF)
> > > > +				can_set =3D 0;
> > 
> > > This is maybe a nit, but writing to the affinity file can fail for a few
> > > different reasons, some of them permanent, some transient.  For instance,=
> >  if
> > > we're in a memory constrained condition temporarily irq_affinity_proc_wri=
> > te
> > > might return -ENOMEM. =20
> > 
> > Yeah true, usually followed shortly by your kernel going so far into
> > swap you never get it back, or OOMing, but I guess it's possible.
> > 
> > > Might it be better to modify this code so that, instead
> > > of using fputs to merge the various errors into an EOF, we use some other=
> >  write
> > > method that lets us better determine the error and selectively ban the in=
> > terrupt
> > > only for those errors which we consider permanent?
> > 
> > Yep. It seems fputs() gives you know way to get the actual error from
> > write(), so it looks we'll need to switch to open/write, but that's
> > probably not so terrible.
> 
> fclose inherits the error from fputs and it sets errno correctly.  Below
> uses this to catch only EIO errors and mark them for the banned list.
> 
> Mikey
> 
> irqbalance, powerpc: add IRQs without settable SMP affinity to banned list
> 
> On pseries powerpc, IPIs are registered with an IRQ number so
> /proc/interrupts looks like this on a 2 core/2 thread machine:
> 
>            CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3
>  16:    3164282    3290514    1138794     983121   XICS             Level        IPI
>  18:    2605674          0     304994          0   XICS             Level        lan0
>  30:     400057          0     169209          0   XICS             Level        ibmvscsi
> LOC:     133734      77250     106425      91951   Local timer interrupts
> SPU:          0          0          0          0   Spurious interrupts
> CNT:          0          0          0          0   Performance monitoring interrupts
> MCE:          0          0          0          0   Machine check exceptions
> 
> Unfortunately this means irqbalance attempts to set the affinity of IPIs
> which is not possible.  So in the above case, when irqbalance is in
> performance mode due to heavy IPI, lan0 and ibmvscsi activity, it
> sometimes attempts to put the IPIs on one core (CPU0&1) and lan0 and
> ibmvscsi on the other core (CPU2&3).  This is suboptimal as we want lan0
> and ibmvscsi to be on separate cores and IPIs to be ignored.
> 
> When irqblance attempts writes to the IPI smp_affinity (ie.
> /proc/irq/16/smp_affinity in the above example) it fails with an EIO but
> irqbalance currently ignores this.
> 
> This patch catches these write fails and in this case adds that IRQ
> number to the banned IRQ list.  This will catch the above IPI case and
> any other IRQ where the SMP affinity can't be set.
> 
> Tested on POWER6, POWER7 and x86.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  
> Index: irqbalance/irqlist.c
> ===================================================================
> --- irqbalance.orig/irqlist.c
> +++ irqbalance/irqlist.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include <dirent.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
>  
>  #include "types.h"
>  #include "irqbalance.h"
> @@ -67,7 +68,7 @@
>  	DIR *dir;
>  	struct dirent *entry;
>  	char *c, *c2;
> -	int nr , count = 0;
> +	int nr , count = 0, can_set = 1;
>  	char buf[PATH_MAX];
>  	sprintf(buf, "/proc/irq/%i", number);
>  	dir = opendir(buf);
> @@ -80,7 +81,7 @@
>  			size_t size = 0;
>  			FILE *file;
>  			sprintf(buf, "/proc/irq/%i/smp_affinity", number);
> -			file = fopen(buf, "r");
> +			file = fopen(buf, "r+");
>  			if (!file)
>  				continue;
>  			if (getline(&line, &size, file)==0) {
> @@ -89,7 +90,13 @@
>  				continue;
>  			}
>  			cpumask_parse_user(line, strlen(line), irq->mask);
> -			fclose(file);
> +			/*
> +			 * Check that we can write the affinity, if
> +			 * not take it out of the list.
> +			 */
> +			fputs(line, file);
> +			if (fclose(file) && errno == EIO)
> +				can_set = 0;
>  			free(line);
>  		} else if (strcmp(entry->d_name,"allowed_affinity")==0) {
>  			char *line = NULL;
> @@ -122,7 +129,7 @@
>  			count++;
>  
>  	/* if there is no choice in the allowed mask, don't bother to balance */
> -	if (count<2)
> +	if ((count<2) || (can_set == 0))
>  		 irq->balance_level = BALANCE_NONE;
>  		
>  
> 
Thank you, this looks good to me, I'll integrate this shortly.
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/