Re: [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue

[Joe Perches]

On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 21:04 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> But the stupid thing is
> trying to do it on a file-by-file basis in the first place, when for
> something like fs/ext4, it really should be done on a subdirectory
> basis.

That's not true at all.

If there's a listed maintainer linked to a pattern
like "F: fs/ext4/", then all files in that
directory and any subdirectories are "maintained".

If a maintainer wants to "exclude" particular files,
or subdirectories, that's possible with the "X:" tag.

> What really annoys me is newbies who use checkpatch.pl in its --file
> mode, and then assume that every single warning is a deadly bug that
> much be patched.

Perhaps checkpatch.pl should print some "don't submit
patches for stupid stuff" when used with -f.

> I at least never use it.

Nor are you required to.

Tool use is optional.  I don't care if you carve
patches with a mallet onto stone tablets and send
them by swarms of carrier pigeon to Linus so can
reuse the stone to build an actual castle.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/