[PATCH 1/5] mn10300: avoid SIGSEGV delivery loop

From: Al Viro
Date: Sun Sep 26 2010 - 14:28:37 EST



force_sigsegv() is there for purpose...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
index 717db14..57178a8 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
return 0;

give_sigsegv:
- force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ force_sigsegv(sig, current);
return -EFAULT;
}

@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
return 0;

give_sigsegv:
- force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ force_sigsegv(sig, current);
return -EFAULT;
}

--
1.5.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/