[PATCH 4/5] mn10300: get rid of set_fs(USER_DS) in sigframe setup

[Al Viro]

It really has no business being there; short of a serious kernel bug
we should already have USER_DS at that point.  It shouldn't have been
done on x86 either...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c |    4 ----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
index 5a2c004..ae36480 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
@@ -333,8 +333,6 @@ static int setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
 	regs->d0 = sig;
 	regs->d1 = (unsigned long) &frame->sc;
 
-	set_fs(USER_DS);
-
 	/* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
 		ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
@@ -416,8 +414,6 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
 	regs->d0 = sig;
 	regs->d1 = (long) &frame->info;
 
-	set_fs(USER_DS);
-
 	/* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
 		ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
-- 
1.5.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/