Re: [PATCH 3/4] fsldma: remove DMA_SLAVE support

[Dan Williams]

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ira W. Snyder <iws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now that the generic DMAEngine API has support for scatterlist to
> scatterlist copying, this implementation of the DMA_SLAVE API is no
> longer necessary.
>
> In order to let device_control() continue to function, a stub
> device_prep_slave_sg() function is provided. This allows custom device
> configuration, such as enabling external control.
>

> +       case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG:
> +
> +               cfg = (struct fsldma_slave_config *)arg;

Now that I actually see someone trying to use the recommended
extension model it comes across as unsafe, what guarantees that arg is
pointing to a fsldma_slave_config.  At at minimum you could ensure
that this channel has been claimed for private usage which loosely
implies that the client knows that it is talking to an fsldma channel.
 Even safer is to just assign you a one-off dma_ctrl_cmd
(FSLDMA_EXTERNAL_START) for this purpose.  Otherwise this and the
other patches look good.

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/