Re: [PATCH] fix 2.6.32.23 suspend regression caused by commit6f6198a
From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Oct 01 2010 - 17:00:53 EST
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:44:11PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 12:16 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 07:04:11AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > Again, with a less bouncy address.
> > >
> > > From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
> > > Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 05:57:59 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH] fix 2.6.32.23 suspend regression caused by commit
> > > 6f6198a
> > >
> > > 6f6198a sched: kill migration thread in CPU_POST_DEAD instead of
> > > CPU_DEAD
> > > leaves migration threads lying about. Mask out CPU_TASKS_FROZEN.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Is this patch upstream already? If so, what's the git commit id of it?
> > If not, why isn't it also needed there?
>
> No, it's not upstream, and will never go upstream because they don't
> need it. It's only needed for -stable because the fix incorporated in
> -stable is incomplete. Upstream already does what this patch adds.
Ah, ok, that makes sense, thanks. I'll queue it up.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/