Re: Fw: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs tobe aborted

From: Stanislaw Gruszka
Date: Tue Oct 05 2010 - 04:55:56 EST


On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:43:05AM +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> commit e7ee762cf074b0fd8eec483d0cef8fdbf0d04b81
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:22 -0700, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > iwl3945's scan_completed calls into the mac80211 stack which triggers a
> > warn on if there is no scan outstanding.
> >
> > This can be avoided by not calling scan_completed but abort_scan in
> > iwl3945_request_scan in the done: branch of the function which is used
> > as an error out.
> >
> > The done: branch seems to be an error-out branch, as, for example, if
> > iwl_is_ready(priv) returns false the done: branch is executed.
> >
> > NOTE:
> > I'm not familiar with the driver at all.
> > I just quickly scanned as a reaction to
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17722
> >
> > the users of scan_completed in the iwl3945 driver and noted the odd
> > discrepancy between the comment above this instance and the comment in
> > mac80211 scan_completed function.
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> go into wireless-2.6 and stable only, scan fix already in
> wireless-next-2.6

>
> Thanks
> Wey
>
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > index 9dd9e64..8fd00a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> > @@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ void iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> > clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
> > clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> > /* inform mac80211 scan aborted */
> > - queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_completed);
> > + queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->abort_scan);

Unfortunately this patch is not right thing to do. If you look at
abort_scan work, it do nothing if STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING bit is not set.
That's wrong because we have to complete scan (with abort == true).
If STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING will be set, abort_work will send scan cancel
commands to hardware what is wrong if scan was not started yet.

What we can eventually do, except apply iwl-scan rewrite from
wireless-testing, is something like that:

iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)

clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
/* inform mac80211 scan aborted */
set_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_completed);

ieee80211_scan_completed

if (!internal) {
bool aborted = test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
ieee80211_scan_completed(priv->hw, aborted);

}

However, I do not think we should go with that to -stable (below
2.6.36). IIRC warnings showed up in current 2.6.36-rc, because of
some other changes in the code.

Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/