Re: [PATCH] sdio: fix suspend/resume regression

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Vitaly Wool wrote:

> Hi Ohad,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > index c94565d..515ff39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > @@ -1682,6 +1682,19 @@ int mmc_suspend_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> >        if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead) {
> >                if (host->bus_ops->suspend)
> >                        err = host->bus_ops->suspend(host);
> > +               if (err == -ENOSYS || !host->bus_ops->resume) {
> > +                       /*
> > +                        * We simply "remove" the card in this case.
> > +                        * It will be redetected on resume.
> > +                        */
> > +                       if (host->bus_ops->remove)
> > +                               host->bus_ops->remove(host);
> > +                       mmc_claim_host(host);
> > +                       mmc_detach_bus(host);
> > +                       mmc_release_host(host);
> > +                       host->pm_flags = 0;
> > +                       err = 0;
> > +               }
> >        }
> >        mmc_bus_put(host);
> >
> 
> what about moving this logic to sdio bus_ops as this seems to be
> completely specific to sdio right now?

It doesn't have to.


Nicolas