Re: [PATCH 8/8] Call tick_check_idle before __irq_enter

[Yong Zhang]

On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 05:03:23PM -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index 267f7b7..6bb7e19 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -296,10 +296,16 @@ void irq_enter(void)
>  
>  	rcu_irq_enter();
>  	if (idle_cpu(cpu) && !in_interrupt()) {
> -		__irq_enter();
> +		/*
> +		 * Prevent raise_softirq from needlessly waking up ksoftirqd
> +		 * here, as softirq will be serviced on return from interrupt.
> +		 */
> +		local_bh_disable();
>  		tick_check_idle(cpu);
> -	} else
> -		__irq_enter();
> +		local_bh_enable();

		_local_bh_enable()

local_bh_enable() could invoke do_softirq().

> +	}
> +
> +	__irq_enter();
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/