Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ofmemory?
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Sun Oct 17 2010 - 10:06:50 EST
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 15:59 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Me, I'm henceforth making sure to have CONFIG_IMA disabled...
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
---
security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
index b6ecfd4..278362c 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ config IMA
whether or not critical system files have been modified.
Read <http://www.usenix.org/events/sec04/tech/sailer.html>
to learn more about IMA.
+
+ When built-in (Y) this option will consume considerable
+ resources even when effectively disabled.
+
If unsure, say N.
config IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/