RE: [PATCH V2 -tip] lib,x86_64: improve the performance of memcpy()for unaligned copy

[Ma, Ling]

>> rep_good will cause memcpy jump to memcpy_c, so not run this patch,
>> we may continue to do further optimization on it later.

>Yes, but in fact, the performance of memcpy_c is not better on some micro-architecture(such as:
>Wolfdale-3M, ), especially in the unaligned cases, so we need do optimization for it, and I think
>the first step of optimization is optimizing the original code of memcpy().

As mentioned above , we will optimize further memcpy_c soon.
Two reasons : 
  1. movs instruction need long lantency to startup
  2. movs instruction is not good for unaligned case.
  
>> BTW the improvement is only from core2 shift register optimization,
>> but for most previous cpus shift register is very sensitive because of decode stage. 
>> I have test Atom, Opteron, and Nocona, new patch is still better.

>I think we can add a flag to make this improvement only valid for Core2 or other CPU like it,
>just like X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD.

We should optimize core2 in memcpy_c function in future, I think.

Thanks
Ling


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/