Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ofmemory?

[Eric Paris]

On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 10:59 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:57:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Well, you could use the actual freezer to freeze luserspace and then
> > simply iterate all open files, I mean, those few sods who actually want
> > this enabled can either pass a boot option to enable from boot or suffer
> > the overhead on enable, right?
> 
> I'm a little confused why anyone would want to turn on IMA at any time
> other than right away at boot?  If you haven't been doing integrity
> management checking from the very beginning of the boot process, what
> does turning on IMA after the system has booted buy you in the way of
> security protections?
> 
> In other words, turning on IMA via a boot option seems to be the only
> thing that makes any sense at all.

It can be turned on any time inside the initrd without loss of integrity
assuming the kernel and initrd were both measured and stored in a TPM
PCR.  I'm willing to agree that the usefulness might be limited, but it
isn't non-existant.  I'm going to make a note to look at other ways to
cut down the memory usage.

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/