Re: [PATCH 1/6] [RFC] posix clocks: dynamic clock ids.

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Richard Cochran wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 05:38:50PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This patch augments the POSIX clock code to offer a dynamic clock
> > creation method. Instead of registering a hard coded clock ID, modules
> > may call create_posix_clock(), which returns a new clock ID.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This patch still has un-addressed lifetime issues pointed out by
> > Alan Cox. More work is needed here, but for now this provides the
> > functionality needed for the following patches.
> 
> I am working on a fully dynamic clock implementation in the style
> suggested by Alan. Using it would change some details in this RTC
> patch series, but not the general idea.
> 
> Should I post the dynamic clock stuff all by itself for review?

Incremental is preferred. We all know by now what it's going to be
used for.
 
Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/