Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drivers: cleanup Kconfig stuff

From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Tue Oct 19 2010 - 11:34:26 EST


Hi,

(already at home so using personal email)

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:32:07 +0300, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are two parts, one part is to fix the Kconfigs, and another was
> to come up with a way to replace the horrible defconfigs. Part two is
> mostly fixed thanks to 'make savedefconfig', since the defconfigs are
> not so horrible any more, but part one is a continued effort.
>
> For part two Linus had the idea to use Kconfigs instead of defconfigs,
> but they would mostly look very similar to the current ones generated
> by 'make savedefconfig'.
>
> I don't know what makes you think Linus didn't want part one to be
> done. He wanted the Kconfig.rx51 to be human readable, and you are
> proposing that TWL4030_USB should be manually added there... I don't
> think TWL4030_USB says anything to human beings.

I don't read anywhere Linus saying we should clutter drivers/*/Kconfig
with defaults. I think you're inverting things, it's much better
to select TWL4030_USB when you enable MACH_OMAP_RX51 then default y
if MACH_OMAP_RX51.

> Yes, but how do you get rid of the defconfig while also having a
> working USB_G_NOKIA? Somehow a transceiver should be automatically
> selected.

and you do that selection when the board is enabled otherwise the
drivers Kconfig will be cluttered with default Y if blabla.

But like I said before, it's Greg's ball. Personally, I think
you're taking the wrong approach.

--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/